Lifestyle
 

Familypedia:Requests for adminship

From Familypedia

This page is to discuss nominations for adminship. Currently only a handful of active genealogists are administrators here. Anyone who would like to be given the extra facility that goes with being a sysop or bureaucrat may nominate themselves or another contributor. See the "ideal" procedural details on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

I guess one necessary rule would be for only logged in users being able to vote. iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 00:26, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Archive for previous nominations: Genealogy:Requests for adminship/Archive To nominate yourself or someone else use the following near the bottom of the page, before the categories.

===([[User:NAME]])===
<!--Replace this with why you should be or someone else should be given sysop powers.-->

''Consent:    ''
====Supporting====

====Neutral====

====Opposing====

[edit] Applications

[edit] Account cleanup

We have a number of dormant, or low participation accounts. It is common wikia practice to periodically review accounts and clear way for active participants to become admins and bureaucrats.

This is no reflection on the value that the community places on the contributions that the individuals have made in the past to Familypedia.

As of the date indicated, the following individuals have been contacted inquiring whether they are interested in resuming active participation at Familypedia. After two months have passed, the accounts will resume being normal accounts unless the community decides otherwise.

[edit] Low participation accounts

  • iFaqeer: admin, bureaucrat. 239 total edits. Last edit on April 2, 2007. Sent mail on 2009-10-14.
  • WMWillis admin, bureaucrat. 10K edits Last logged in on August 9, 2007. Sent mail on 2009-10-14.
  • Nhprman admin. 136 edits. Last logged in July 14, 2006. Sent mail on 2009-10-15.

-~ Phlox 16:38, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

That's probably a good idea. Thanks for your conscientious work! —DeGraffJE talk 17:12, October 16, 2009 (UTC)